
The bike-sharing industry is on the rise. It is the only mobility industry that statistics indicate didn't experience significant losses during the pandemic. The future is also bright as there are government initiatives around the world to support bike-sharing. However, there are things that newcomers in the business can learn from the previous leaders - success in the industry with high demand is no guarantee that the company will be a success.
A bike is a comfortable means of transportation in regions where motorized vehicles are widely used but create heavy traffic jams and pollute the air. This is a problem in regions like Asia-Pacific, North America, and Europe. And this is where and why bike-sharing has become popular. According to the Statista Mobility Outlook, bike-sharing was the only mobility sector that grew its global revenues during the pandemic by a third in 2020. The single-person set-up and open-air nature of bike riding made it the perfect mode of transportation for the pandemic.

Bike-sharing is a shared transport service in which convectional bikes or electric bikes are made available for shared use to individuals on a short-term basis for a price or free. Development of software, GPS technologies, mobile payments, and IoT devices, as well as reduced locking and tracking system costs for bikes, have recently led to the popularity of a dockless bike-sharing system that allows users to leave the bike anywhere convenient.
According to Mordor Intelligence, the bike-sharing market was valued at USD 3 billion in 2020, and it is anticipated that it will reach USD 4 billion by 2026. The COVID-19 pandemic affected the bike-sharing sector in several countries. The most negative consequences were the daily decline in bike bookings.

Bike demand is majorly driven by developing countries, such as China and India that especially focus on e-bikes. China has always been the largest exporter of e-bikes. According to China’s Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the country's output of electric bicycles reached 25.48 million during the first 10 months of 2020, a year-on-year increase of 33.4%. During this period, the revenue of major bicycle manufacturing companies reached about USD 22 billion, an increase of 16.8%. According to the China Bicycle Association, from January to September 2020, the volume of bicycle exports was 12% up on the same period last year, rising to USD 2.43 billion.
However, the bike-sharing market growth in Europe is predicted to be the fastest across the globe, as it is anticipated that a large number of service providers will venture into the region in the coming years. In regional countries, bikes are being rapidly made available near major transit hubs, such as railway stations, thereby offering users convenience and ease of travel. In addition, the European Union (EU) also promotes such services, because they are environment-friendly and help to reduce traffic.
Global bike-sharing service market size between 2020 and 2026 in billion U.S. dollars according to Statista:

Currently, major players in the bike-sharing market are:
- Uber Technologies Inc. - provides opportunities to rent a bike in a partnership with Lime. Jump brand bikes are available after Lime acquired the Jump company.
- Lyft Inc. - in November 2018, Lyft acquired Motivate, a bicycle-sharing system and the operator of Capital Bikeshare and Citi Bike. It thus became the largest bike-share service in the United States.
- Hellobike - a transportation service platform based in Shanghai, China. Founded in 2016, the company merged with Youon Bike the following year. In a series of fundraising rounds dating back to 2016, Hellobike has raised over US$1.8 billion from investors.
- DiDi Bike - Didi Chuxing Technology Co. is a Chinese vehicle for hire company headquartered in Beijing with over 550 million users and tens of millions of drivers. The company provides app-based transportation services, including bike-sharing.
The biggest companies in the market are associated with China as are the biggest deals. Looking at the recent biggest deals in bike-sharing, the first worth mentioning involved Didi Chuxing’s bike-sharing arm Qingju. It raised USD 600 million in a Series B equity fundraising round and will be granted an additional USD 400 million in loans.
What was also interesting that at the end of 2020 the mobile application of Mobike, one of China's earliest and largest bike-sharing providers, went offline after its acquisition by Meituan three years before. Mobike was acquired by Meituan for USD 2.7 billion in April 2018. In January 2019, in an internal letter to employees Wang Huiwen, co-founder and Senior Vice-President of Meituan, informed them that Mobike will be renamed Meituan Bike and that the firm would become a unit of the new parent's location-based service department.
The growing interest in e-bikes
One trend that will definitely influence the industry in the near future is the growing interest in e-bike sharing. Pedelecs or pedal electric cycles or EPAC (Electronically Power Assisted Cycles) are becoming increasingly popular. This is a type of electric bicycle where the rider’s pedaling is assisted by a small electric motor. Such vehicles are capable of higher speeds, compared to manually operated bikes. As the demand for higher speeds for short-distance traveling increases, so does the preference for e-bikes. People are ignoring the fact that sharing services on pedal-assisted bikes are cheaper than e-bikes, as the latter offers effortless driving, more convenience, and variable motor power, as well as higher speeds.
One of the most interesting investment deals in 2020 that underlines the interest in e-bikes involved London-based free-to-use shared electric bike firm London-based HumanForest. It announced in September that it had raised £1.8 million. HumanForest offers 20 minutes free per day and a corporate subscription service. It launched in June 2020. In just four months of the company’s operations, 14,000 riders have taken almost 42,000 rides with the number of rides increasing by over 100% month on month!
Later that year, the company raised £1.27m via crowdfunding with the support of over 520 investors, of whom approximately 30% were trial users. The company says that it ran a successful trial during summer 2020 in London with 200 e-bikes. The new funds will be used to expand the fleet to 1,500 e-bikes.
HumanForest’s business model is based on three sources of revenue - users pay 15p per minute after their free daily 10-minute ride is up, while partner companies pay to advertise their brand on the HumanForest digital platform and companies pay to offer their employees further minutes for the HumanForest fleet.
Bike-sharing - more positive than negative aspects
If we analyze positive, as well as negative aspects that could influence the future of bike-sharing, the positive aspects far exceed the negative ones. The only negative aspects are high initial investment costs, as well as the rise in bike vandalism and theft. Positive aspects that could stimulate the bike-sharing business in the future are growing venture capital investments, an increase in the inclusion of e-bikes in the sharing fleet, as well as technological advances in bike-sharing systems.
There is also increased interest from governments in different initiatives for the development of bike-sharing infrastructure. Furthermore, governments are offering subsidies to service providers for developing stations and expanding their reach to a large number of commuters. For instance, in 2018, Chinese Municipal governments subsidized the Public Bike Sharing Program development to encourage non-motorized transport and offer convenient, flexible, and low-cost mobility options. Meanwhile, in Europe, the new public bike-sharing system was launched in the Italian Municipality of Trieste in February 2020. The system, known as BiTS, is being implemented as part of the city's Integrated Sustainable Urban Development Plan at a cost of EUR 390,000, with the aim of developing sustainable mobility by promoting walking and cycling to reduce urban pollution.
Despite the fact that interest in bike-sharing is rising and will continue to do so, it is equally important to learn and not forget the mistakes of pioneers of the industry. For example, the company Ofo was founded in 2014 as a university project, but soon afterward raised $866 million from investors led by Chinese e-commerce giant Alibaba. Ofo was a station-free bike-sharing platform operated via an online mobile application. In total, over the course of nine investment rounds, the company has raised USD 2.2 billion but has still consistently experienced cash flow problems that were driven largely by intense competition in a market that has yet to be proven to be commercially viable according to analysts interviewed by Forbes.
Fees dropped to 1 yuan ($0.14) for each hour of use and sometimes were even free. Despite this fact, Ofo still managed to reach a valuation of $2 billion in a 2017 funding round and around $3 billion at its highest point, and at one time the company deployed more than 10 million bikes globally and attracted as many as 200 million users. “The company’s cash-burning operations and high valuation have combined to deter potential investors, and when capital became scarce, the startup could no longer cover its once sprawling operations,” wrote Forbes.
In 2018, Ofo announced a massive reduction in operations, and by 2020 it faced a large amount of unpayable debt as a result of which the company was no longer operating bike rentals. “Explanations of what exactly went wrong are still evolving, but it seems likely that the mind-boggling amounts of cash pumped into what wasn't essentially a "bike-sharing" model, but rather a rental business pepped up by a smartphone app, had something to do with it. Yes, the company bought bikes and placed them in the streets without docks for anybody to use, and that was somewhat new. And yes, a smartphone app served as the key. But the company owned the bikes, just like any old-fashioned rental shop, and incurred huge maintenance costs,” explained analysts from Roland Berger Strategy Consultants, who were quoted in its magazine “Own the future”.
So it doesn't matter how big the demand for the service is, you should always apply simple business principles to your business.

Most taxi companies don’t fail because of tech - they fail because no one knows they exist 👀 In today’s market, competing with Uber isn’t about features, it’s about demand. 📈 No brand, random marketing, “Later” mindset results in low utilization & slow growth. In this article, we break down the most common mistakes - and how to build a marketing system that actually drives rides 🚀
Most taxi and ride-hailing companies don’t fail because of bad technology. They fail because no one knows they exist. In a market shaped by players like Uber, demand is no longer something that “just happens.” It’s engineered. Built. Optimized. Repeated.
Yet many operators still treat marketing as something secondary - something to figure out after the launch, after the fleet is ready, after drivers are onboarded. By then, it’s already too late.
A common pattern we see is this: a company launches with a functional product, maybe even a solid operational setup, but without a clear brand or acquisition strategy. A few campaigns are tested, some budget is spent across different channels, but nothing is consistent. There is no clear positioning, no defined audience, and no system to measure what actually works.
The result is predictable. Growth is slow, utilization stays low, and pressure starts to build. At that point, marketing becomes reactive - driven by urgency rather than strategy. Discounts increase, experiments multiply, and costs rise faster than revenue.
This is where many businesses lose control of their unit economics.
Why bad marketing happens
Poor marketing rarely comes from a lack of effort. It usually comes from wrong priorities. Many operators believe they have more urgent problems to solve - fleet, drivers, operations - and that marketing can wait. It feels logical in the short term, but in reality it’s a short-sighted decision that creates much bigger problems later.
Another common issue is lack of direction. Marketing activities exist, but they are scattered and unstructured. There is no clear target audience, no defined positioning, and no consistent brand language. Without that foundation, even well-funded campaigns struggle to deliver results.
This is where the gap between smaller operators and companies like Uber becomes obvious. The difference is not just budget - it’s clarity. They know exactly who they target, how they communicate, and how they measure success.
Without that clarity, marketing becomes noise. And noise doesn’t convert.
When marketing is treated as optional
In early stages, many companies treat marketing as a “nice to have.” Budgets are allocated to everything else first, and whatever remains is used for promotion - if anything is left at all. The assumption is simple: launch first, invest in marketing later.
The same thinking often leads to another mistake - launching with a weak or non-existent brand. A generic app, no clear identity, no differentiation. It may save money initially, but it creates a much bigger problem: people don’t remember you, and you can’t build demand around something that has no identity.
At some point, reality catches up. Growth is slower than expected, revenues don’t match projections, and pressure builds. That’s when companies switch into reactive mode. Marketing becomes urgent instead of strategic. Discounts increase. Random campaigns are launched. Budgets are spent faster, but results don’t improve. Panic replaces planning - and panic-driven marketing almost never works.
How to build a marketing system that actually works
Forget random marketing. It doesn’t scale. If you want predictable growth, start here:
- Map all key marketing activities needed to generate demand (which 2-3 channels you will use to attract users?)
- Define your target audience and core differentiation (how you are different from others?)
- Set a realistic marketing budget upfront
- Work with professionals who understand mobility (execution matters)
- Focus on a few channels that actually convert
- Track core KPIs: installs → first ride → retention
- Continuously adjust based on real data, not assumptions
The earlier you build this system, the faster you reach profitability.
How ATOM Mobility helps operators grow
At ATOM Mobility, we’ve seen this dynamic across hundreds of mobility businesses globally. The difference between those who scale and those who stall rarely comes down to technology alone. Execution is what separates them.
That’s also why we expanded beyond software and, together with industry experts, launched a dedicated marketing service to support operators directly.
We help mobility businesses go from zero to scalable demand - covering go-to-market strategy, branding, performance marketing, app store optimization, and continuous growth management, all tailored specifically for ride-hailing and taxi operators.
👉 Learn more and see how we can support your growth:
https://www.atommobility.com/marketing-agency

⚡ Launch faster and integrate anywhere with ATOM Mobility API. Build your own mobility experience without rebuilding the backend. Learn how ATOM Mobility API lets you integrate, customize, and scale faster.
Shared mobility is moving beyond standalone apps. Operators today are expected to integrate into existing ecosystems - from hotel and airport platforms to corporate travel tools and MaaS apps. Building all of that from scratch is slow, expensive, and hard to scale.
That’s why ATOM Mobility offers a fully developed OpenAPI - allowing you to build your own mobility experience on top of a proven backend.
From app to platform
Most mobility solutions are still built as closed systems. That creates friction: integrations take time, custom features require heavy development, and expanding into new channels becomes complicated.
An API-first approach changes this.
Instead of rebuilding core functionality, operators can use ATOM Mobility as the underlying system and build their own layer on top. Booking flows, payments, vehicle control, and operational logic are already there - accessible via API.
What this enables in practice
With API access, mobility can be embedded directly where users already are.
- A ride can be booked from a hotel website. A car can be unlocked through a partner app. A custom frontend can be built for a specific market without touching the backend.
- At the same time, operators can connect their own tools: from internal dashboards to finance and reporting systems (for example, Power BI) creating a more automated and scalable operation.
The result is not just a mobility app, but a flexible system that can adapt to different markets, partners, and use cases.
What you can manage with ATOM Mobility API
🚗 Booking & ride management - search vehicles, reserve and unlock, start and end trips, manage ride status.
💳 Payments & users - create and manage users, handle payments and pricing, access booking history.
🛴 Fleet & operations - vehicle status and location, zones and restrictions, pricing configuration.
🔌 Integrations - connect third-party apps, sync with external systems, automate workflows and more...
Few use cases we already see
1. Embedded mobility in partner platforms
Booking directly from (no app download needed):
- hotel websites
- airport kiosks
- corporate travel portals
- MAAS apps (such as Umob)
2. Custom frontends and apps
Operators build:
- branded web apps
- niche UX flows
- country-specific experiences
All powered by ATOM Mobility backend.
3. IoT and hardware integrations
- sync vehicle data
- control locking/unlocking
4. Automation & internal tools
- reporting dashboards
- finance automation
- customer communication flows
Instead of spending months building core systems, operators can use ATOM API and focus on what actually drives growth - distribution and partnerships.
Interested to learn more or try it out?
Learn more:
https://www.atommobility.com/api
Explore the API:
https://app.rideatom.com/api/docs


