The mobility industry is growing at a rapid rate, with innovations happening across cars, bikes and scooter sharing alike. This article explores the most recent advancements in the market and how industry leaders are finding new ways to compete. Learn about the different models for Mobility as a Service and what it means for the future of transportation.
Car Sharing Services
According to research by the Internet of Things, the number of carsharing service users across the world is expected to grow from 50.4 million people in 2018 to 227.1 million in 2023. The number of cars used for car sharing services is also forecasted to increase from 332,000 at the end of 2018 to 1.2 million by 2023. The rising demand for these services has driven more companies towards developing methods of sharing that go beyond traditional single use cars.
Image source: Internet of Things
A new model of car sharing that has recently grown in popularity is free floating carsharing, which allows users to pick up a car in one location and return it anywhere within a predefined Home Zone. Challenging the idea of ownership, this service currently has 3 million users worldwide, with over 30 thousand vehicles available across more than 50 cities.
there are currently over 30 thousand vehicles equipped with this service across more than 50 cities worldwide
Dailmer and BMW became a leader in the free floating industry when they merged their two car sharing services, Car2Go and DriveNow, in February 2019 to form SHARE NOW. With over four million members, the free floating car rental service is available in 18 major cities across Europe with a fleet of 20,500 vehicles to choose from. Members register through a mobile app, gaining access to the services for the cost of $0.32 per minute. The company covers the fixed costs of car loans, car insurance and car maintenance so users are able to enjoy the freedom of driving without the responsibility of ownership.
The largest benefit of free float car sharing is the higher demand that can be met on average per ride and car each day. However, this model still includes a lot of operational day-to-day tasks such as maintenance, relocating, fueling/charging that can require a larger team.
The traditional model of car sharing services is station based, where users can pick-up vehicles from a fixed rental station after filling out paperwork in person or through a mobile app. After signing an agreement, the renter is able to drive the car wherever they would like. The lease ends once the car is returned to a designated rental station that has been approved by the provider. This model does not provide the same flexibility to users that newer offerings have, however, it remains one of the best ways for providers to track the vehicles without developing complex systems.
Enterprise CarShare is an example of traditional station based car sharing services. Offering users three membership levels to choose from, the pricing varies based on hourly, daily and overnight rates as well as kilometers driven. Depending on the membership, hourly rates are around $8, daily rates $75 and overnight rates start at $29. The vehicles are available for pick-up at designated stations or lots and can be returned at the discretion of the user to any Enterprise location at the end of their trip.
Compared to free float services, station based car sharing has lower operational costs since only a few fixed stations need to be monitored and checked each day. Right now this model is most profitable in the market, once free float operators enter on a wider scale it will be harder to keep up with the high demand.
Peer-to-peer car sharing services have experienced large growth in the past few years. Research found that by 2017, more than 2.9 million people in North America were using these services renting over 131,336 vehicles. Peer-based car-sharing fleets expanded by 80 percent between 2016 and 2017 and memberships doubled.
The peer-to-peer car sharing model allows users to list their own vehicles on a sharing platform, connecting hosts to guests looking to rent. This style of sharing allows users to set their own rental rates, while giving members who are looking to rent a wider selection of vehicles to choose from.
Turo is a leader in the peer-to-peer sharing industry, serving as a marketplace where guests can book any car they want from hosts across the US, Canada, the UK and Germany. The guests are able to choose from a unique selection of cars within their area, while allowing the hosts an opportunity to earn extra money to offset the costs of ownership. The company currently has over 10 million users, with more than 350,000 vehicles listed for rent.
Image source: cnet
The rates for Turo are charged by the hour and are subject to adjustments made either by the company’s own algorithm or the specific daily rates charged by each host.
In this model, the operator acts as an aggregator without ownership over the vehicles, which makes it easier to scale the business without the need for huge capital investments. However, it becomes more difficult to control the quality of the experience since every car cannot be checked on a regular basis. It is important to establish a strong customer support team to help resolve any issues that occur.
The future of car sharing is focused on eliminating the driver all together. Autonomous vehicles are beginning to make their way into the marketplace, with the hope being that fleets of self-driving cars will be able to pick-up users at any given location and return to the designated charging area all on their own.
A leader in this next step of mobility is Waymo, a company that emerged from Google’s self-driving car project. The company launched their first commercial self-driving-car service in December 2018, in Phoenix. The self-driving cars operate in an approximately 100-square-mile radius, serving the towns of Chandler, Gilbert, Mesa and Tempe. Available to a select few pre-approved riders, the hope is that driverless vehicles will be a main part of transportation in the future. There are currently around 1,500 monthly active users helping with the testing program.
In theory, the economics of this model should be great as there is no driver costs or relocating costs, keeping operational requirements to a minimum. These vehicles will however be heavily regulated, with limited access in the near future.
Bike Sharing Services
The demand for accessible transportation in cities has expanded beyond traditional motor vehicles. Across the world, urban areas are beginning to adapt bike sharing programs that allow citizens to use both standard bicycles and e-bikes as a form of travel. The bikes are usually selected from one docking station, and later returned to another across the city. There is currently believed to be nearly 900 bike-sharing systems available globally, with continuous advancements being made each year.
The bike sharing market is expected to grow from a $2.7 billion dollar industry to $5 billion by 2025, according to a report by Research and Markets. That in mind, bike sharing companies across the world should approach expansion with caution to avoid over extending their services. In 2018, Chinese bike sharing start-up Ofo experienced financial decline due to their costly global expansion that was not supported by commercial success. The company was unable to maintain the accessibility of its competitors who partnered with mobile app providers, offering them a wider reach for their services. Without support from an investment partner, Ofo could no longer sustain the maintenance of its bike sharing fleets, let alone compete in the market.
We believe you can build a successful bike share company once you have the right strategy in place. It is important to be operationally efficient when starting out, initially launching a smaller fleet and growing organically with the demand. If you start by scaling wide without having the matching demand, your resources will be spread too thin. The most successful bike share programs work with the local municipalities and cities to determine revenue streams and find the best options to connect with riders.
Dockless Bike Sharing
The dockless bike sharing model offers users access to bicycles that do not require a docking station. Dockless systems allow the bikes to be located and unlocked through a mobile app then returned to a designated district at a bike rack or along the sidewalk. This model is designed for short term use, ideal when travelling or visiting somewhere as a tourist. Most dockless sharing services offer single rides for $1 or monthly fees for continuous use.
Lime was one of the first companies to offer dockless bike services. Users access the bikes at designated areas through the company’s mobile app, initially they are charged a fixed rate to unlock the vehicle and then per minute for the duration of their trip. The rates and promotions available vary based on location and time. Program packages are also offered for users who wish to make monthly payments or have the services available to their employees on a regular basis.
This model of bike sharing is ideal for users because it is easily accessible and convenient to employ every day. There are high operational costs that come with this type of service, as well as a larger risk for vandalism or damage to the bikes.
Traditional bike share programs include docking stations where the bicycles are locked until a user purchases a ride. The user pays at a nearby pay station before unlocking the vehicle for a short term trip, later returning it to any available docking station when finished. There are typically two types of payment options available, a flat membership fee or pass that allows access to the bikes for a certain period of time and then a usage fee that charges for the amount of time you spend riding.
San Francisco is one of the first cities to create a regulatory and permitting framework around the trend of bike-sharing. In December 2019, 4,000 e-bikes were launched as part of the Bay Area bike sharing program, designed to make mobility easily accessible to citizens. The program provides rides with the option to purchase a single ride, starting at $2, through Lyft’s mobile ride-sharing app. There are over 300 docking stations available throughout the city, allowing users to travel across the Bay Area more efficiently.
The Capital Bikeshare, in Washington D.C. has a membership fee of $85 annually offering lower usage charges throughout the year. For the first 30 minutes a ride, members aren’t charged, they then receive a rate of $1.50 for the next 30, $3 for the third and finally an additional $6 for every other 30 minute period. For non-members, the first 30 minutes also has no charge but they experience higher fees for every 30 minutes after that. The higher usage fees are balanced out by lower costs at the start -- a daily Capital Bikeshare pass is only $8 and a monthly pass comes to $28.
Station based bike sharing can help bring a stable ROI for every bike since operational costs are low, and there is a minimal need for maintenance, relocation or charging. As dockless bikes continue to expand in the market, this model risks losing loyal users in the long-run.
Sponsored by Corporate
Some bike share programs operate in partnership with corporations who sponsor the vehicles. Operating like a standard bike share program, these vehicles operate in conjunction with the local municipalities.
In London, the city offers a public bicycle hire scheme funded by Santander UK. With more than 750 docking stations and 11,500 bikes available for hire around the city, users have easy access to the vehicles. The program operates 24 hours a day, year-round with an initial cost of 2 Euros for a daily trip, charging an additional 2 Euros per half hour after the first 30 minutes. Users have the option to hire a bike using their bank card at the docking station, or through the official mobile app.
This model is great for any operator that can find a reliable partner who is interested in establishing this type of deal, however, you still run the risk of losing that partner later on.
Scooter Sharing Services
The fastest growing trend in mobility is the advent of e-scooters. They are inexpensive, accessible through mobile apps similar to bike sharing and available in over 100 cities worldwide. According to the US National Association of City Transportation Officials, riders took 38.5 million trips on shared electric scooters in 2018 compared to the 36.5 million trips on docked bikes. The Boston Consulting Group estimates that the global e-scooter market will grow to US$50 billion by 2025, with approximately 50% of the users being located in Europe and the USA. Micro-mobility is quickly becoming the preferred method for short term travel and companies have already begun to emerge as leaders in the market.
Image source: nacto.org
Similar to station based bikes, some e-scooter providers offer docking stations where the scooters can be unlocked through a mobile app and then returned later to any available docking station.
DASH Scooters operates out of Nashville, TN, offering docked e-scooters styled like vespas that can be rented at set rates through their mobile app. Starting at $40 for two hours, the rates increase based on time travelled and day of the week. The brand launched after the emergence of other leaders such as Bird, Lime and Spin, who have set the bar for innovation in e-scooters. Their app allows users to locate nearby docking stations where the scooters can be returned to at the end of a trip.
The best way for operators to get a high return on their business is to have a combination of station based and dockless scooters. This will help maintain growth over time, while keeping up the high demand.
Leaders in the mobility industry have begun to focus on the possibilities of dockless scooters. This model involves e-scooters that do not require a docking stations, but instead can be rented from a designated location and then returned anywhere in another.
Spin operates in 62 cities and 20 campuses across the United States, offering fleets of electric scooters for easy, short term travel. Users are able to unlock the scooters through their mobile app, once the ride is complete they can leave the scooter at any designated location and the cost will appear on the app. Charges vary depending on the length of the ride.
This model is currently experiencing high demand due to its convenience and ease of access for users. There are a large amount of maintenance and operational costs required, similar to other dockless mobility services, as well as increasing regulations across cities.
While the future of e-scooters in cities is an on-going process, the services have begun to expand into the tourism sector. Hotels and resorts have begun to offer scooter sharing services to allow guests to easily travel throughout the location, or explore local surroundings. The options vary between station based and dockless scooters, with pricing packages being dependent on the destination.
Rentskoot is a start-up in Finland that offers small fleets of electric scooters to hotels. Guests are then able to rent the scooters from the hotel premises as a unique way to experience the local neighbourhoods. The company provides operational training to staff, free maintenance and the ability to advertise the hotel’s logo on the scooters. Travelling at a maximum speed of 25 km/h, the compact size and battery life makes this service ideal for short term use within cities.
By focusing on hotels, this model allows businesses to be more innovative with their designs while keeping a consistent demand amongst the growing market. An agreement will need to be made with the hotel in advance regarding guidelines for use and overall costs distribution.
What does this mean for the future of mobility?
The car sharing industry is projected to reach a 16.5 billion USD revenue by 2024, with an annual increase of 34.8% every year. A trend towards electric vehicles is also predicted as the demand for lithium-ion batteries has been predicted to increase by 380% by 2025. In addition, the bike and scooter rental market is expected to grow from USD $2.5 billion in 2019 to USD $10.1 billion by 2027, at a CAGR of 18.9 percent. Dockless systems will most likely continue to dominate the market, as their flexibility and ease has historically made them the more popular option for riders.
Every sector of MaaS has one thing in common: the desire to make transportation easier for riders. Ultimately each service compliments the other by providing different options for mobility that can each work together to get a user from point A to point B and back. If someone arrives in the city by train, they could then travel to work using an e-bike or e-scooter to avoid traffic. When returning home late at night a car sharing service could be used to get them there in one trip. The hope is that the future of mobility will consist of a connected network designed for safe, efficient and easily accessible travel.
With this quickly growing market on the rise, there hasn’t been a better time to become a leader in mobility.
Click below to learn more or request a demo.
For shared mobility operators, fleet insurance should be one of the top priorities. No matter the size or composition of your fleet, having the right insurance can offer peace of mind by protecting your business from unforeseen situations
However, the insurance question can sometimes seem daunting – especially if you're new to the industry. In this article, we will explore the key things you need to know about insuring your shared micromobility fleet.
Why you need insurance
Operating a shared mobility fleet isn’t always smooth sailing. Accidents can happen – whether it's a minor fender-bender or something more severe. Insurance serves as your safety net, offering financial coverage for repairs, replacements, and even potential legal obligations after an incident.
Here are the main reasons why insurance should be one of the top priorities for shared mobility fleet operators:
Legal compliance: In many places, insurance for shared mobility fleets is a legal requirement. You probably want to comply with these regulations to avoid any potential fines, penalties – or even the suspension of your operations.
Financial security: Insurance also helps keep your business going financially, no matter what happens. Without insurance, accidents, vehicle damage, or theft can seriously impact your finances. Comprehensive insurance coverage can ensure that you're not left scrambling to cover any unexpected expenses.
Understanding shared micromobility insurance
When it comes to insuring micromobility fleets, part of the challenge stems from the fact that the market is relatively new. Some insurance underwriters avoid dealing directly with micromobility because it's seen as an unfamiliar market.
This is where brokers like Cachet and others specializing in micromobility insurance come in. They partner with various insurance underwriters to provide coverage for operators in this field.
When it comes to shared micromobility, insurance coverage generally has a twofold role: safeguarding assets and handling third-party engagement in the event of accidents.
Liability coverage: Securing third-party public liability insurance for shared mobility fleets is not just a matter of choice – in some places, it's mandated by law. This insurance serves to protect pedestrians and riders in the unfortunate event of accidents, providing financial coverage for injuries and damages that may arise. In other words, it's a safety net that offers peace of mind to operators.
When it comes to mandatory third-party liability insurance, the negotiations with the insurance company usually begin by figuring out what the local authorities require to give them a permit. After that, the insurance policy is adjusted to meet the specific demands outlined by these authorities.
Physical damage coverage: This covers the repair or replacement costs of vehicles if they are damaged due to accidents, collisions, vandalism, or theft. Depending on the policy, physical damage coverage may also extend to equipment like GPS devices, charging stations, and other hardware.
What decides your insurance premium payments?
The amount you'll pay in premiums depends on various factors that are specific to your business This includes your fleet's makeup, where and how you operate, and the level of coverage you're aiming for.
Fleet usage: The more a shared micromobility fleet is used, the more chances there are for things to go wrong. When a fleet is in high demand and used often, there's a greater likelihood that something might happen that requires insurance coverage.
Rider behavior: Insurance companies also consider the fleet's ability to predict and manage undesirable rider behavior. Reckless riding, improper parking, or violating traffic rules can significantly increase the risk of accidents and incidents. Operators that have better measures in place to anticipate and mitigate such behaviors can demonstrate a lower risk profile to insurance providers.
Value of the fleet: How much your vehicles are worth individually and as a fleet will affect how much you pay for insurance. If your vehicles are expensive, your insurance premiums will be higher because it would cost more to replace them if they get damaged or lost.
Size of the fleet: Operators can often negotiate more favorable insurance rates for proportionally larger fleets. As the number of vehicles increases, the overall expected risk is distributed and “diluted” as a result – which translates to lower premiums per vehicle.
However, some brokers like Cachet have embraced a broader approach, ensuring that smaller and medium-sized fleets can also benefit from insurance coverage.
Technology implementation: Shared mobility services that employ technologies like GPS tracking, telematics, and IoT devices can provide insurers with valuable data. This data can then help assess driver behavior and usage patterns, enabling insurers to offer more accurate and tailored premium rates. This also takes into account how simple it is for scooters to be stolen and how well the recovery processes function – which can also play a role in insurance expenses.
Where you operate: The location in which your fleet operates is another important factor. From the insurer’s perspective, different areas pose varied levels of risk. For example, urban mobility – which is associated with a higher risk of accidents – may incur higher premiums compared to vehicles used in rural areas.
Level of coverage: The level of coverage you choose directly affects how much you pay in premiums. Opting for higher coverage limits means you get more comprehensive protection, but obviously, it also means your insurance costs go up.
Choosing the ideal insurance for your fleet
Every shared mobility fleet and business is different, so your insurance needs will depend on things like the type and size of your fleet, where you operate, how much risk you're comfortable with, and of course – how much you are willing to pay.
For example, do you require coverage for specific risks, like vandalism, or perhaps your fleet is composed of premium vehicles that are more expensive? To make it more relatable, let's dive into a practical case of a shared micromobility operator's experience with insurance.
How Hoog found the right insurance with Cachet
The concept behind Hoog Mobility is to revolutionize transportation in smaller Estonian towns. They recognized the need for efficient and eco-friendly local travel and brought a shared mobility solution often seen in big cities but missing in smaller communities: electric scooters.
Cash-strapped mobility startups often worry about potential damage or vandalism happening to their shared vehicles. This concern is shared by traditional insurance companies too. As a result, these insurers might hesitate to provide coverage for shared scooters, and if they do – it's usually at a higher cost.
Faced with this challenge, Hoog initially operated without insurance due to the steep expenses. But that changed when Cachet provided them with a customized insurance solution that perfectly suited the company's needs. Hoog also realized that the initial worry about vandalism wasn't as much of an issue as they thought. But still – having insurance for their fleet turned out to be a sound financial decision that gave them peace of mind.
Don't underestimate insurance – it's just as crucial as having a top-notch fleet and solid software. Insurance is best approached proactively – discovering you've cut corners after an unforeseen event will cost you significantly more.
Getting insurance for shared micromobility might be a bit trickier since it's still a new concept, but we've seen that even smaller fleets can make it work – it's just a matter of finding a suitable partner who understands your needs.
At the end of the day, insurance isn't merely about meeting legal requirements – it showcases your dedication to safety, responsible operations, and the well-being of everyone involved in your mobility business.
Shared mobility is gaining momentum – offering prospects for reducing traffic, cleaning up city air, and providing users with more flexible transportation options. However, despite its potential, shared mobility often seems to take a backseat to traditional public transportation and private vehicles in the eyes of local authorities and infrastructure planners.
Experts see shared mobility as a game-changing revolution in transportation. It surpasses the earlier revolution of the 20th century when personal cars became widely affordable and accessible. Now, with the rise of shared mobility and environmental concerns, the old notion of "one car per person" is becoming outdated.
In light of this, authorities worldwide should proactively prepare for a future where shared mobility plays an increasingly significant role. In this blog post, we'll explore different ways authorities and legislators can encourage shared mobility – and why it's totally worth it.
The positive impact of shared mobility
Shared mobility has the potential to fix some of the problems we face with transportation today, benefiting users, cities, and the environment. Here are the key benefits of shared mobility:
- Reduced congestion: Shared mobility can alleviate traffic congestion, leading to smoother traffic flow and shorter commute times.
- Environmental sustainability: Shared mobility can reduce the number of vehicles on the road, resulting in lower greenhouse gas emissions and a smaller carbon footprint. This helps combat air pollution and mitigate the environmental impact of transportation.
- Improved transport accessibility and flexibility: Shared mobility services make transportation more accessible, especially for those without private vehicles or limited mobility options. They also offer convenient alternatives to traditional transportation methods.
Considering the urgent need to combat climate change, shared mobility holds a significant promise as a greener transportation option. The European Union's Green Deal aims to achieve a 90% reduction in transportation-related greenhouse gas emissions by 2050. Shared mobility – coupled with increased adoption of electric vehicles and a broader shift in transportation behaviors – will likely play an important role in achieving this goal.
However, for shared mobility to truly flourish and revolutionize transportation, it needs a supportive environment backed by legislative frameworks and infrastructure planning. So, let's take a closer look at how authorities can foster wider adoption of shared mobility.
1. Favorable regulations with an eye on the future
In the past, shared mobility solutions and business models have faced challenges in gaining acceptance from regulators. A prime example is the initial response of local authorities to Uber’s novel services at the time – ordering them to cease their operations immediately.
Shared mobility services can disrupt traditional transportation models – which may not be welcomed by everyone. However, the undeniable popularity of these services, exemplified by the rapid success of Uber, demonstrates the high customer demand.
Instead of battling against it, authorities might want to shift their focus to creating a supportive legislative framework, recognizing the significant benefits shared mobility can bring. It means regulations that prioritize safety, fair competition, consumer protection, and quality standards – creating an environment where shared mobility can thrive and provide reliable services to customers.
Shared mobility is constantly evolving, which means that regulations need to be flexible and adaptable to keep up with emerging technologies and new challenges. For example, as autonomous vehicles become a possibility, authorities will need to establish guidelines for their safe integration into existing transportation networks.
2. A collaborative approach
Collaboration between local authorities and businesses can be a decisive factor in creating a favorable environment for shared mobility. By working together, they can tackle common challenges, share data, and develop integrated transportation solutions.
Public-private partnerships can also involve incentives like tax breaks or subsidies to encourage the adoption of shared mobility. For example, offering tax breaks to companies that implement ride-sharing programs for their employees can encourage the use of shared transportation options instead of individual cars. Similarly, providing subsidies for shared mobility providers can help offset the initial costs of implementing and expanding their services.
Sharing data between shared mobility platforms and transport authorities is another way to benefit from this cooperation. The platforms have valuable information on accidents, trip patterns, and driver availability. Sharing this data with local authorities can help improve the transportation network, enhance travel apps, and identify underserved areas.
3. Building infrastructure to support the future of transportation
To meet evolving transportation needs, authorities should invest in infrastructure that supports innovative modes of transportation like electric vehicles and shared mobility services. By considering the needs of shared mobility users, infrastructure planners can make it a much more attractive transportation option.
Here are the key infrastructure needs for shared mobility:
Integration with existing infrastructure: To offer users smooth and effective transportation choices, shared mobility must seamlessly integrate with current transport systems like public transit. It should enable users to plan multi-modal journeys and switch between different modes of transport without hassle. For example, users should be able to seamlessly transition from a shared bike or scooter to a bus or train.
Charging stations: Keeping shared electric vehicles performing at their best relies on maintaining their charge. This requires establishing a network of strategically positioned charging stations throughout urban areas. If we're aiming for more people to use electric vehicles, we need to make charging them easy and accessible.
Dedicated parking: Shared mobility services need designated parking areas for their vehicles, such as bike racks and car-sharing parking spots. Well-organized parking infrastructure can reduce street clutter and make it easier for others to grab a shared mobility vehicle.
Information infrastructure support: Running shared mobility services smoothly, including handling bookings, payments, and logistics, depends greatly on a reliable information infrastructure foundation. With the advent of advanced networks like 6G, users will increasingly rely on this infrastructure to stay connected and make the most of these services.
The shared mobility landscape in France
Paris's recent ban on free-floating e-scooters has put France in the spotlight. To take a closer look at the shared mobility environment in France, we turned to Manon Lavergne, CEO of Viluso, a shared micromobility operator. We asked for her insights on the state of micromobility in the country.
Since the Mobility Orientation Law in 2019, the French government has been working to make shared transport easier to access everywhere. At COP 26 in 2021, France undertook to cut its CO2 emissions by 55%.
According to Manon, personal vehicle ownership in urban settings is losing favor among many French citizens, and Paris stands out as a shared micromobility epicenter. The city pioneered self-service shared mobility networks like Vélib' (2007), Autolib' (2011), and Cityscoot's shared electric scooters (2016).
However, in April 2023, Paris residents voted to ban free-floating e-scooters in the city. The reasons behind this decision included riders competing for space with pedestrians on sidewalks and complaints about e-scooters cluttering the pavements when parked.
Captur's case study on e-scooter parking habits in Paris revealed that the majority of users encountered no problems when parking scooters in designated bays. However, outside of the designated areas, users had to compete with other vehicles, resulting in poorer parking choices.
This example again emphasizes the need for proper infrastructure to support shared mobility. Lots of cities around the world were mainly designed with private cars in mind – which can create challenges for accommodating shared mobility solutions.
Anne Hidalgo, Paris' Mayor, campaigned with a strong green agenda and has introduced various changes to tackle pollution and traffic jams. Her vision includes a "15-minute city" where people can access work, shopping, healthcare, education, and leisure within a 15-minute walk or bike ride from their homes.
Yet, the chaotic state of free-floating e-scooters in Paris resulted in their ban. This scenario raises a question for other global cities: How can shared mobility be encouraged without disrupting other transportation choices and pedestrian movement?
According to Manon, the upcoming 2024 Olympic Games in Paris, which will draw many visitors, will provide valuable insight into the city's transportation system – including the viability of shared mobility.
Shared mobility is here to stay – so start planning today
By adopting a supportive approach, authorities worldwide can play a crucial role in enabling the full potential of shared mobility. While it may require a shift in mindset, the potential gains of reduced congestion, environmental sustainability, and improved transportation options make it a worthwhile consideration.
We know that shared mobility is here to stay and will only expand in the coming years. By taking a more proactive stance, authorities will be in a better position to integrate and maximize the full benefits of shared mobility.