How can car-sharing help to save the planet? (bonus: most popular car sharing apps review)
September 27, 2021
min. read
Climate changes this summer have warned us as never before. Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from transportation account for about 29 percent of total U.S. greenhouse gas emissions alone, making it the largest contributor of U.S. GHG emissions. It is not easy to refuse the comfort that car ownership provides. However, nowadays you have the option of sharing cars and only using them when necessary.
At first glance, owning a car looks convenient, and indeed it is in terms of driving. But it also means constant costs and the loss of value of your property - your vehicle. Experts say that a car loses between 15% and 20% of its value each year.
Car owning vs car sharing
What else do car owners pay for? Constant investments have to be made in repairs and maintenance, for example, when washing the car or changing the oil and filling it with gas, or charging in the case of an electric vehicle. In addition, adjustments to the weather conditions are mandatory, for example, changing tires before the winter and summer seasons. The car should have insurance while in traffic and you should also cover parking costs not to mention the fact that you have to have places to park your car that could be easily reached from home, as well as from the office.
You can avoid all those troubles when choosing a ride-sharing option - your car will always be full of gas or charged, clean, and with the equipment that is adjusted to the season. No additional costs - just pay for your ride and leave the car where it is convenient for you. Moreover, if you need a bigger car for the ride with the whole family, you can have it! Just choose a SUV closer to you with the car-sharing option. And pay less for a small car if you are riding alone.
Car sharing is also more convenient than renting a car. Renting invariably means planning, scheduling, and getting to the parking lot for rented cars. Renting sometimes also involves hidden costs. Car-sharing is easier - if the car is not available at the moment at the closest to your location, look around in the app and you will definitely find a spot, where a car is available near you.
Game changer
Nearly 90% of Americans own cars. Unfortunately, this means not only a convenience for car owners but also traffic jams and pollution. And according to The Guardian, this quantity of cars costs the economy $124bn. So car-sharing has been seen as a real game-changer. According to a Berkeley study, one car for sharing can replace 7 to 11 privately owned vehicles. Thus cities can become greener not only in the context of reduced levels of air pollution, but also significantly reduced parking lots. Moreover, this means less wear on roads as fewer cars drives around the streets.
Fine, but what is the real advantage, when there are still a lot of cars on the street? How does this actually help to save the planet? Well, with car-sharing there still will be fewer cars on streets and in traffic. Car-sharing providers are thinking of their business so they will always choose the most fuel-efficient cars. Whenever possible, electric cars are going to be included in their fleet. Electric cars have zero emissions. Also, more small cars are going to be available as people who are driving alone don't need big cars or ones that consume a lot of fuel. This means less air pollution. And the air is also less polluted during the manufacturing process because 1/5 of emissions released in a car’s lifetime come from its production. This amount is even smaller with electric cars as they are smaller themselves so they cause less greenhouse gas emissions in production.
Of course, there are also some downsides to switching to car sharing. For example, manufacturers cannot be happy with smaller demand. A lot of factory workers and their families depend on the demand and income from car production. In addition, fewer public transport users mean less income for public transport companies.
Struggles for car-sharing businesses
There are still quite a lot of struggles for car-sharing business owners. For example, experts emphasize that car sharing is beneficial only in areas with the appropriate population density. In other words, there should be a demand for the service. The biggest challenge of the car-sharing business is to survive in small villages where people usually travel large distances to work and it is more convenient and probably even cheaper for them to have their own cars.
The other issue worth mentioning, which is a challenge faced by big cities is parking lots. There should be enough free spaces in the city to park cars. Especially in high-density areas. If this possibility is not available and users have to travel long distances from the parking lot to the office or house, users will soon lose interest in the service.
What other obstacles should car-sharing business owners consider? Demand for cars via sharing is not constant. There are peak hours that are hard to manage due to the limited amount of vehicles, while users easily get upset if a car is not available when they need it. In addition, people want to use car-sharing across as wide a geographical area as possible. This creates challenges for car-sharing business owners, as there should be enough users all around, who are willing to use the service.
Best car-sharing apps according to Google Play and App Store
● Share Now (car2go & DriveNow)
App Store Rating: 4.8/5
Google Play Rating: 4.4/5
There is no monthly or membership fee - users pay while using the service. Rates depend on vehicle and location and gas is included in the price so there is no need to refuel. There is a 24-hour limit on rental time or the option to select the trip package while indicating the length of the trip. No reservations are required - pick up and drop off the vehicle anywhere within the area of operation.
● Zipcar
App Store Rating: 4.5/5
Google Play Rating: 3.8/5
Zipcar charges $7 per month or a $70 per year membership fee. There is also a one-time $25 application fee. Car sharing service costs $10 per hour or $82 a day. It is possible to rent a car for hours or days however there are a few plans available. Prices vary depending on location. Gas, insurance, and 180 miles are included in the price.
● Getaround
App Store Rating: 4.7/5
Google Play Rating: 3.7/5
This app has a $99 hardware fee. After three months, a $20 per month subscription fee kicks in. Daily rental rates can range from $20 to $80 depending on vehicle quality and insurance is included in the price. A variety of privately-owned cars, vans, and trucks are available. It is possible to rent them by day or hours. Drivers pay for gas and replace what they have used.
● Turo
App Store Rating: 4.8/5
Google Play Rating: 4.9/5
Cars are available on the app anywhere from $20 to $100 depending on vehicle quality and only daily rentals are possible. It has classic and specialty vehicles. Drivers pay for gas and must replace what they have used. Cars can also be delivered to a location if required.
You can take part in the car-sharing business as a user, as well as a car-sharing business owner. If you want to create your own platform, this is what you have to consider and keep in mind.
Ask AI for an article overview
Let AI explain why entrepreneurs choose ATOM Mobility
Interested in launching your own mobility platform?
Blog
Micromobility fleet vehicles: Types, features & best use cases
🚲 🛴 E-scooters or e-bikes? Docked or dockless? Every vehicle choice shapes the success of your micromobility business. In this new article, we break down the key micromobility fleet vehicles – their features, best use cases, and how to match them to your city profile. Plus, how ATOM Mobility helps operators manage both scooter and bike fleets in one platform.
July 21, 2026
min. read
Operators entering the micromobility space today face one major early decision: which vehicles to deploy. Your fleet type affects user experience, operational costs, maintenance needs, and regulatory compliance. Whether you plan to launch e‑scooters, e‑bikes, mopeds, or a mixed fleet, each vehicle category serves a different purpose.
This guide covers the main micromobility fleet vehicles – bike, e‑bike, kick scooter, e‑scooter, moped, and e‑moped – along with their features, common manufacturers, docking options, and ideal use cases.
Understanding the vehicle types
Bike (mechanical bicycle) A standard pedal bicycle with no motor. In shared fleets, mechanical bikes are simple, durable, and cost‑efficient. They require minimal electronics and are ideal for cities with strong cycling infrastructure. They generate lower maintenance costs but depend entirely on rider effort. Normally, user demand for this type of bike is also lower, thus operators can expect lower RPV rate (rides per vehicle per day).
E‑bike (electric bicycle) An electric bike combines pedal power with an electric motor that assists the rider. E‑bikes allow longer trips, easier hill climbing, and broader user appeal. Typical shared e‑bike trips range between 5–10 km. They cost more upfront but often generate higher revenue per ride. Many fleet operators source models from manufacturers such as Segway‑Ninebot, Okai, and Yadea. You can explore available e‑bike hardware options on the ATOM Mobility vehicles page: https://www.atommobility.com/vehicles.
Kick scooter (non‑electric scooter) A kick scooter is manually powered by pushing off the ground. While less common in commercial shared fleets today, they are still used in some controlled campus or tourism environments where low speed and low complexity are priorities.
E‑scooter (electric scooter) E‑scooters are lightweight, battery‑powered vehicles designed for short urban trips, typically under 4 km. They are highly flexible and well suited for dense city centers and first‑mile/last‑mile transport. Modern fleet models include swappable batteries, improved braking systems, suspension upgrades, and integrated IoT modules. Popular manufacturers include Segway‑Ninebot, Okai, and Navee that can also be found at ATOM Mobility.
Moped (fuel‑powered light motorcycle) A moped is a small motorized vehicle traditionally powered by gasoline, offering higher speeds and longer range than bikes or scooters. In shared mobility, fuel mopeds are becoming less common due to emissions regulations but still operate in some regions.
E‑moped (electric moped) An e‑moped is an electric version of a traditional moped. It provides longer range and higher speed than e‑scooters, often up to 45 km/h depending on local regulations. E‑mopeds are ideal for suburban areas or cities with longer commuting distances. Manufacturers such as NIU, Silence, Super Soco, and Yadea dominate this segment.
The table below provides a general comparison of the most common shared mobility vehicle types, including typical purchase prices, expected service life in commercial fleets, and average utilization (rides per vehicle per day). Actual figures vary depending on manufacturer, market, operating conditions, and fleet maintenance.
Approx. new purchase price – The typical cost of purchasing a new commercial-grade vehicle for a shared mobility fleet. Prices vary depending on the manufacturer, hardware specifications, battery capacity, IoT integration, and fleet order size.
Approx. used purchase price – The typical market price of a pre-owned commercial vehicle suitable for shared mobility operations. Factors such as vehicle age, mileage, battery health (for electric vehicles), overall condition, and refurbishment status significantly influence the price.
Typical fleet lifespan – The average period a vehicle remains economically viable in a shared mobility fleet before being retired or replaced. Lifespan depends on ride frequency, maintenance quality, weather conditions, road infrastructure, vandalism, accidents, and how intensively the fleet is operated.
Average rides/day/vehicle (RPV) – Rides Per Vehicle per Day (RPV) is one of the most important performance metrics for shared mobility operators. It measures the average number of completed trips each vehicle performs daily. Higher RPV generally leads to better fleet utilization, faster return on investment, and improved profitability. Actual RPV varies depending on vehicle type, city size, demand, seasonality, pricing strategy, fleet availability, and operational efficiency.
Docked vs dockless infrastructure
Beyond vehicle choice, parking strategy matters. Dockless fleets offer flexibility but may create parking compliance challenges. Docked systems use physical stations that improve order, security, and charging efficiency.
Several manufacturers specialize in docking and locking infrastructure, including KNOT CITY (which recently is out of market), and Kuhmute. These docking systems can improve vehicle organization, reduce vandalism, and simplify charging logistics for e‑bikes and e‑mopeds.
E‑scooters: Best for dense urban zones
E‑scooters work best in compact city centers, student districts, and areas with high short‑trip demand. They require less parking space and are faster to deploy. However, they demand consistent maintenance and battery management.
E‑bikes: Broader demographic appeal
E‑bikes provide greater comfort and stability, making them suitable for older users, tourists, and riders carrying bags. They perform well in cities with established cycling lanes or moderate hills. Although more expensive than scooters, they often achieve longer ride durations and stronger customer loyalty.
E‑mopeds: Extended range and higher revenue potential
E‑mopeds are suitable for cities with wider geography or suburban commuting patterns. They typically deliver higher revenue per trip but require licensing compliance and more robust fleet management.
Matching vehicles to city profiles
Tourist cities often benefit from e‑bikes due to comfort and sightseeing suitability. College towns frequently lean toward e‑scooters because of affordability and convenience. Larger or hilly cities may support mixed fleets. Suburban zones often justify e‑mopeds for longer travel distances.
Climate also influences hardware decisions. Wet or cold regions require sealed wiring, water‑resistant components, and tires suitable for slippery conditions.
Planning your hardware strategy
Choosing the right fleet is not only about vehicle type. It involves sourcing reliable manufacturers, evaluating docking options, understanding regulatory requirements, and planning maintenance cycles. Reviewing available hardware categories through ATOM Mobility’s vehicles directory can help operators compare models and integrations before committing to a large fleet purchase.
The most successful operators treat fleet composition as flexible. They start with one category and expand based on usage data, seasonality, and rider behavior. A balanced hardware strategy allows adaptation without replacing the entire fleet.
ATOM Mobility supports mixed fleets – including e‑scooters, e‑bikes, and e‑mopeds – within one platform, covering booking, payments, hardware integrations, and analytics. This allows operators to scale gradually while maintaining operational control.
Vehicle choice is not static. As cities evolve and regulations tighten, operators who understand their hardware options and adapt quickly are better positioned for long‑term growth.
Blog
How to launch a taxi business without building everything from scratch
🚕 Getting drivers on the road is not the only thing you need to launch your taxi business. Many new platforms struggle with the same problem – drivers with no demand and riders with no available drivers. Building both at the same time is where most launches fail. This article introduces the key steps to launch a taxi business and avoid the most common mistakes.
July 15, 2026
min. read
Launching a taxi business today takes more than having drivers. It requires a system that can attract riders, onboard drivers, manage bookings, process payments, and keep daily operations running smoothly as demand grows.
The ride-hailing market is growing fast, while customer acquisition is getting more expensive and more competitive. Technavio estimates the global ride-hailing market will grow by more than $102 billion between 2024 and 2029, which creates room for new operators, but also raises the cost of visibility, paid acquisition, and brand differentiation in crowded markets, according to this ride-hailing services market forecast.
Many operators now launch faster by using ready-made tools instead of building every part from scratch. ATOM Mobility has already helped operators launch mobility businesses in as little as 90 days through a phased rollout covering market validation, legal setup, branding, driver onboarding, and launch execution.
But how to actually launch your business, if you’re not willing to do everything from scratch?
1. Start with a market gap, not with the app
Most taxi businesses do not fail because the app is missing a feature but because there is no clear reason for customers to switch. Before choosing software or recruiting drivers, define where your opportunity is. That could mean:
- poor service in smaller cities
- premium airport rides
- business travel
- women-only rides
- scheduled transport
- local business transport partnerships
This matters more than most expect. Your pricing, branding, driver experience, and customer acquisition all depend on the niche you choose. That is why defining a clear angle early matters, especially in crowded markets.
2. Get legal and operational basics in place
A taxi business is still a regulated business. Before launch, you need to set up the basics properly:
- business registration
- local taxi or ride-hailing permits
- insurance
- driver requirements
- vehicle checks
- payment compliance
Skipping this part slows everything down later.
This is also the stage where many founders underestimate operating costs. Beyond software, you will need to plan for driver incentives, support, payment processing, and customer acquisition. That is one reason many operators now launch with white-label software instead of funding a custom build from day one.
3. Launch with ready-made software, not custom development
Building a taxi app from scratch is expensive (in many cases we see it costs more than 30 000 -50 000 EUR), slow (takes many monhts), and usually unnecessary. To launch a working taxi business, you need:
- rider app
- driver app
- dispatch logic
- payment system
- admin dashboard
- support tools
- analytics
- integrations
Most early-stage operators do not need to build these systems themselves but a working infrastructure they can brand and launch quickly. That is why many operators start with ATOM Mobility, where the full system already includes rider and driver apps, dispatch tools, payments, analytics, integrations and backend operations in one platform. This is the same logic behind building a branded taxi service with white-label software instead of spending months on custom development.
4. Make driver onboarding simple from day one
Driver onboarding needs to be fast and easy enough that drivers can register, upload documents, get approved, and start working without delays. But if onboarding takes too long, drivers drop off before they complete their first ride.
A strong launch setup should include:
- fast registration
- document upload
- quick approval flow
- simple earnings tracking
This is also where the ATOM Mobility driver app becomes important, since it gives drivers one place to accept rides, navigate, manage earnings, and stay active without switching between tools.
5. Give users more than one way to book
Many taxi businesses still focus only on app installs but that is a mistake. Not every rider wants to download an app before booking a ride. This is especially true for airport pickups and tourists in general, hotel guests, older riders, and occasional users. That is why booking flexibility is important. Alongside mobile apps, many operators now add browser-based booking so riders can order without installing anything.
This is what ATOM introduced with its Web Booker for ride-hail, which gives operators a simple way to capture web traffic, direct bookings, and one-time users without forcing an app download.
6. Build supply and demand at the same time
You need both, drivers and riders, to be interested in your service from day one – drivers will not stick around without rides and riders won’t pick you if there are no available drivers.
That means:
- recruit drivers before launch
- pre-seed rider demand
- test dispatch density
- launch in one focused zone first
- avoid expanding too early
This is one reason local launches tend to perform better than city-wide launches. Smaller launch zones create stronger supply-demand density and better first user experience.
7. Plan marketing before launch, not after
Most taxi businesses fail because not enough people know they exist, not because they lack great technology. Founders often spend months building operations, then treat marketing as something to figure out later, which can become an aspect in which the expenses start rising fast.
You need:
- launch campaigns
- local paid ads
- rider promos
- referral loops
- landing pages
- retargeting
ATOM now offers a dedicated marketing agency for mobility businesses, built specifically for operators who need help acquiring riders, running paid campaigns, and building predictable demand. Without consistent rider acquisition, even a strong product struggles.
8. Think beyond taxis from the start
Many operators launch with taxis first, then expand into extra services once demand is stable.
That could mean:
- airport transfers
- scheduled rides
- delivery
- business transport
- shuttle services
- car sharing or rental
- micromobility
This is one of the strongest advantages of launching on flexible mobility software. You are not building a single-use taxi app but a mobility platform that can grow. That is also why ATOM’s ride-hailing platform was built to integrate with broader shared mobility services instead of staying limited to one transport model.
If you’re launching a taxi business, building the right system usually is more important than building a software from scratch. The strongest operators start with a clear market gap, launch with ready-made tools, onboard drivers quickly, give riders flexible booking options, and invest in demand early.
Driver App demo credentials - Email: test@atom.com, Password: driver
